I don't go for modern horror - no Saw, Ring or I know what you did last summer - do it for me. I was never really into Jason or Freddy that much either. But horror done right is horror done right and Legion and Daybreakers are good spooky fun. And available to rent!
Daybreakers takes place in a not so distant future where a "virus" has turned most of the population on Earth into vampires. Things were fine as long as there was plenty of blood donors, so to speak, around. When a blood crisis occurs it turns this otherwise civilized world on end (oil anyone?). I do mean "civilized." Other than the fact that everyone is a vampire - things hum along like they do now. Daybreakers has a clever story, bloody effects and a reliable cast of actors including Ethan Hawke and Sam Neill (a personal fav!). This story could have been just some gorefest but it is clever and well thought out. The vampire story has been told and re-told but when a different take is taken - it's a treat.
I will tell you there is a good amount of blood, bloodletting, eviscerating, feeding and blood curteling screams. If you are used to that kind of stuff and don't wince then you are going to be fine. If you are squeamish, I can't recommend this unless you can keep that at bay. That is too bad because it is a great movie!
MMMM (out of 5 M's)
ps. Other vampire movies that are outside the usual vampire box - 30 Days of Night and Let The Right One In. Both movies have been reviewed on this blog. Also, available to rent.
Legion appeals to me because I am interested in all kinds of religious mythos movies. I will watch any kind of TV, movie or documentary about the holy grail, the stigmata, shrouds, etc. I have always found that stuff fascinating! So, watching a movie about angels bent on the destruction of human kind and one angel who won't let that happen is right up my alley.
Legion follows the angel Gabriel as he casts himself out of heaven and cuts off his wings, to protect a young pregnant waitress at a desert truck stop. Of course, the truck stop is in the middle of a deserted desert. The waitresses unborn child is apparently going to restore God's hope in mankind. There are other folks in the restaurant as well - the owner, his son (in love with the waitress), a couple traveling with their obnoxious teenage daughter, the cook and a young man who is just passing by. The fun in this kind of thing is always guessing who is going to be knocked off first in some horrific way! And this movie does not disappoint! Dennis Quaid, as the restaurant owner and Paul Bettany, as Gabriel, lead the cast through lots of zombies, gore and high body count. This movie could have been corny but really has enough to keep it from going there. It is often predictable but has a few surprises. And wait until you see how the angels use their wings as weapons. It's wicked. Once again - not for the faint of heart or stomach.
MMM (out of 5 M's)
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Sunday, May 23, 2010
SHREK Forever After
I was not on board with the first two Shrek movies. I didn't think they were all that and in fact, I thought the first one paled in comparison to the real brilliant animated film of Monsters Inc., released the same year. In spite of my low opinion on the wildly popular green giant - I watched the second one and then with great delight watched the third one. Shrek the Third redeemed the series for me. I know some folks that didn't warm up to it but I think you would have to be a parent to understand Shrek's anxiety of being a new parent and the baby humor that ensued. I wondered - could they do it again? A resounding - "yes!"
Shrek Forever After is great fun! Michael Myers, Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy and Antonio Banderas are back to lend their voices to the leading cast. Like the other Shrek movies there is humor in it for kids and definitly for adults to enjoy. And much like the third installment it deals with parenthood. In Forever After, everyday life is the same for Shrek: babies waking him up, feeding them, changing diapers and being interrupted every time he wants time to himself. Ah, parenthood! Shrek misses his old life as a scary Ogre and makes a deal that would change his life and everyone elses. Shrek finds himself the George Bailey of Far Far Away and at first, it is fun being scary again but then misses his family. No one knows him - not Donkey, Puss or Fiona. Shrek must figure out a way to make things right.
Alternate universe plots are always fun! Who doesn't like Spock with a beard? Red head Olivia? Well...anyway...with an alternate world a filmmaker can really have some fun with the familiar characters.
Shrek Forever After is a real treat. Go see it, laugh and feel good afterwards. I took my 4 1/2 year old daughter who wondered why I was laughing so hard at some of the scenes. Maybe when she is a Mommy she'll understand.
MMMM (out of 5 M's)
Shrek Forever After is great fun! Michael Myers, Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy and Antonio Banderas are back to lend their voices to the leading cast. Like the other Shrek movies there is humor in it for kids and definitly for adults to enjoy. And much like the third installment it deals with parenthood. In Forever After, everyday life is the same for Shrek: babies waking him up, feeding them, changing diapers and being interrupted every time he wants time to himself. Ah, parenthood! Shrek misses his old life as a scary Ogre and makes a deal that would change his life and everyone elses. Shrek finds himself the George Bailey of Far Far Away and at first, it is fun being scary again but then misses his family. No one knows him - not Donkey, Puss or Fiona. Shrek must figure out a way to make things right.
Alternate universe plots are always fun! Who doesn't like Spock with a beard? Red head Olivia? Well...anyway...with an alternate world a filmmaker can really have some fun with the familiar characters.
Shrek Forever After is a real treat. Go see it, laugh and feel good afterwards. I took my 4 1/2 year old daughter who wondered why I was laughing so hard at some of the scenes. Maybe when she is a Mommy she'll understand.
MMMM (out of 5 M's)
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Iron Man 2 Reviewed by The Movie Sith
Iron Man II (No Spoilers here)
As sequels go, IM2 really delivered for me. This can be directly attributed to the return of the director and most of the cast, one replacement and three notable additions.
Cast - It's difficult to ignore the talent level Marvel Studios has pooled into this franchise. The performances are top notch. Cheadle is more than adequate in Howard's shoes, adding to the "buddy" feel of the relationship. All the chemistries were in sync, Downey Jr. is good with everyone. Rourke, Rockwell and Johannson all pull their weight.
Plot - While I miss the impact of the "newness," these characters have a lot to say and they get the job done. Ultimately the protagonist's challenges balance out, reminding me in Stark's world of corporate plight is as real as the physical and internal struggles he faces. Make no mistake...this film is no Dark Knight. The comedic moments make up most of the finest exchanges and are delivered flawlessly. For the younger audience the pace may lag around the half-way point but there was no "filler," the script was very tight.
Have fun with Iron Man II. It's one more stone in the monument Marvel is building as they bring their Mightiest Heroes to life.
3 out of 4 stars
The movie mommy humbly thanks the Movie Sith for his review. The Lord of Comics and Master of Artistic Novelty is welcome to review on this blog anytime!
As sequels go, IM2 really delivered for me. This can be directly attributed to the return of the director and most of the cast, one replacement and three notable additions.
Cast - It's difficult to ignore the talent level Marvel Studios has pooled into this franchise. The performances are top notch. Cheadle is more than adequate in Howard's shoes, adding to the "buddy" feel of the relationship. All the chemistries were in sync, Downey Jr. is good with everyone. Rourke, Rockwell and Johannson all pull their weight.
Plot - While I miss the impact of the "newness," these characters have a lot to say and they get the job done. Ultimately the protagonist's challenges balance out, reminding me in Stark's world of corporate plight is as real as the physical and internal struggles he faces. Make no mistake...this film is no Dark Knight. The comedic moments make up most of the finest exchanges and are delivered flawlessly. For the younger audience the pace may lag around the half-way point but there was no "filler," the script was very tight.
Have fun with Iron Man II. It's one more stone in the monument Marvel is building as they bring their Mightiest Heroes to life.
3 out of 4 stars
The movie mommy humbly thanks the Movie Sith for his review. The Lord of Comics and Master of Artistic Novelty is welcome to review on this blog anytime!
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Sherlock Holmes
In order for me to write this review I must give you some background on the character and you will see why I am trashing this crappy movie.
Sherlock Holmes is a well loved literary character dating back to short stories that began in 1887 and written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Holmes appeared in 56 short stories and 4 full length books. In 1887 they were published in a magazine and the readers looked forward to the exploits of Holmes. The interesting thing about the Holmes' stories is that they were set in the period they were written. Sherlock Holmes was brilliant, a drug addict, recluse and scared his land lady on more than one occasion with his strange goings on in his flat. He also had one of the first recorded Bro-mances* with his faithful friend, Dr. John Watson. No sidekick was more loyal to his friend or put up with as much but Dr. Watson was no fool. Dr. Watson was himself a decorated war veteran and well known physician. During the course of the stories, Watson went from being a housemate to Holmes to having his own established practice and getting married. Watson is a key figure in all the Holmes' adventures because he narrates all the stories from his point of view. Watson's view of Holmes' strange and brilliant behavior is what brings a human angle to an otherwise unlikeable man like Holmes. Sherlock Holmes was above all an English gentleman. This something that may be lost on someone today but to carry oneself and to be recognized as a gentlemen in those times was key to success. Holmes had clients that were royalty and often well to do and that would not have been the case for the character of Holmes in the new Sherlock Holmes movie.
Sherlock Holmes: Robert Downey, Jr. was wise to follow up his Iron Man success with another big movie. His big comeback was important and it is always important to keep that momentum going. I guess is the movie. But I think this movie is a total dog. True, I am a literary Sherlock Holmes fan but I am willing to watch different portrayals and there have been some brilliant ones, such as, Frank Langella and Jeremy Brett. This version of Holmes is so far off the mark that it should have been called something else. True, this Holmes does have the powers of observation but with the attitude of a frat boy, not a gentleman. I would rather watch the Mentalist with Simon Baker on Thursday nights. Baker's character is easily a modern day Sherlock Holmes and truly pays homage to a gift of figuring people out just from observing them.
The plot of Sherlock Holmes is so muddled that I can't even describe it. Something about secret societies, black magic and even a toss in of Dr. Moriarty (Holmes nemesis) as a tease. A sequel is in the works - I don't know why. That was like having a sequel of Steve Martin's Pink Panther (which they did!) - totally a waste.
I don't want to you think my review is totally biased because I am a Holmes fan of the first order. I am okay with changing up. J. J. Abrams took a huge undertaking of keeping true to Star Trek lore yet adding his own slant to it and brilliantly. I was willing to give it a chance as I was with Superman Returns. Like Superman and Captain Kirk, some characters deserve respect. If you are not going to do that - change the name of the character. The former Mr. Madonna (Guy Ritchie) has not impressed me with this outing.
You don't have to be a big reader to get into Holmes. If you want to see the most true portrayal of Sherlock Holmes then get the BBC series of the same name with Jeremy Brett. There is also a filmed stage version with Frank Langella which is also very good.
Don't waste you time with this rubbish.
BOMB! (No M's)
*Bro-mance: Describes the complicated love and affection shared between two straight males. They are so close that they seem like a couple. (Urban Dictionary)
Sherlock Holmes is a well loved literary character dating back to short stories that began in 1887 and written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Holmes appeared in 56 short stories and 4 full length books. In 1887 they were published in a magazine and the readers looked forward to the exploits of Holmes. The interesting thing about the Holmes' stories is that they were set in the period they were written. Sherlock Holmes was brilliant, a drug addict, recluse and scared his land lady on more than one occasion with his strange goings on in his flat. He also had one of the first recorded Bro-mances* with his faithful friend, Dr. John Watson. No sidekick was more loyal to his friend or put up with as much but Dr. Watson was no fool. Dr. Watson was himself a decorated war veteran and well known physician. During the course of the stories, Watson went from being a housemate to Holmes to having his own established practice and getting married. Watson is a key figure in all the Holmes' adventures because he narrates all the stories from his point of view. Watson's view of Holmes' strange and brilliant behavior is what brings a human angle to an otherwise unlikeable man like Holmes. Sherlock Holmes was above all an English gentleman. This something that may be lost on someone today but to carry oneself and to be recognized as a gentlemen in those times was key to success. Holmes had clients that were royalty and often well to do and that would not have been the case for the character of Holmes in the new Sherlock Holmes movie.
Sherlock Holmes: Robert Downey, Jr. was wise to follow up his Iron Man success with another big movie. His big comeback was important and it is always important to keep that momentum going. I guess is the movie. But I think this movie is a total dog. True, I am a literary Sherlock Holmes fan but I am willing to watch different portrayals and there have been some brilliant ones, such as, Frank Langella and Jeremy Brett. This version of Holmes is so far off the mark that it should have been called something else. True, this Holmes does have the powers of observation but with the attitude of a frat boy, not a gentleman. I would rather watch the Mentalist with Simon Baker on Thursday nights. Baker's character is easily a modern day Sherlock Holmes and truly pays homage to a gift of figuring people out just from observing them.
The plot of Sherlock Holmes is so muddled that I can't even describe it. Something about secret societies, black magic and even a toss in of Dr. Moriarty (Holmes nemesis) as a tease. A sequel is in the works - I don't know why. That was like having a sequel of Steve Martin's Pink Panther (which they did!) - totally a waste.
I don't want to you think my review is totally biased because I am a Holmes fan of the first order. I am okay with changing up. J. J. Abrams took a huge undertaking of keeping true to Star Trek lore yet adding his own slant to it and brilliantly. I was willing to give it a chance as I was with Superman Returns. Like Superman and Captain Kirk, some characters deserve respect. If you are not going to do that - change the name of the character. The former Mr. Madonna (Guy Ritchie) has not impressed me with this outing.
You don't have to be a big reader to get into Holmes. If you want to see the most true portrayal of Sherlock Holmes then get the BBC series of the same name with Jeremy Brett. There is also a filmed stage version with Frank Langella which is also very good.
Don't waste you time with this rubbish.
BOMB! (No M's)
*Bro-mance: Describes the complicated love and affection shared between two straight males. They are so close that they seem like a couple. (Urban Dictionary)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
